Creator's Choice sounds good to me! And if a different number is wanted, maybe the number could be included too - "Creator's choice of 2 Hogwarts Professors"? (But then, it's unknown whether that's Dumbledore & Flitwick or Dumbledore/Flitwick, so maybe they're better listed one by one? "Creator's Choice of Professor/Creator's Choice of Professor")
And "All" would be interpreted as platonic, e.g. "All Marauders" = "James & Remus & Sirius & Peter".
I think asking people to list specific group members might be tricky for large groups, for example "Ash & Any Pokemon". That sounds like a fair request to me, and it's clear as-is. That said, I think listing members is crucial for an "All" nomination if there's any ambiguity.
One thing I'm a bit worried about is whether "All" will be used to get around the OR matching. If I request "All Weasley siblings", now the creator is required to include all 7 of them, while if they were requested individually, the creator would only have to include one.
no subject
And "All" would be interpreted as platonic, e.g. "All Marauders" = "James & Remus & Sirius & Peter".
I think asking people to list specific group members might be tricky for large groups, for example "Ash & Any Pokemon". That sounds like a fair request to me, and it's clear as-is. That said, I think listing members is crucial for an "All" nomination if there's any ambiguity.
One thing I'm a bit worried about is whether "All" will be used to get around the OR matching. If I request "All Weasley siblings", now the creator is required to include all 7 of them, while if they were requested individually, the creator would only have to include one.